"Sometimes it is unclear what is driving a litigation, and only by reading between the lines of a complaint can one attempt to surmise a plaintiff's true purpose. Other times, a complaint is so unabashedly and vociferously about one thing that there can be no mistaking that purpose. This case represents the latter circumstance. This case is about punishing the defendants for their speech," Breyer wrote in his opinion.
The first report, titled 'The Disinformation Dozen,' focused on vaccination opponents. The second debunked Musk's claims of reduced hate speech. The third detailed Twitter's ad revenue from banned accounts.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]