Slashing Science Funding Is the Opposite of Efficiency
Briefly

The Trump administration is significantly reducing funding for university research, notably through cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). This downsizing, justified as a move towards efficiency, is poised to cripple basic scientific research, potentially leading to long-term detrimental impacts on American innovation and public health. Critics argue that while immediate financial savings may occur, the long-term repercussions could result in increased taxpayer costs and a decline in public well-being. Additionally, new policies on administrative costs aim to limit overhead expenses, exacerbating the funding deficit for scientific endeavors.
The cuts to university research grants will make America sicker and poorer in the long run.
Cutting basic science funding violates the mandate to make government more efficient.
These moves might save money in the short run, but in the years to come, they will cost taxpayers dearly.
Elon Musk has claimed that universities were siphoning off research money for overhead, suggesting these cuts are justified on efficiency grounds.
Read at The Atlantic
[
|
]