How the Supreme Court could be blamed for a future market crash
Briefly

Supreme Court rulings limit federal agencies like the SEC, potentially resulting in watered-down regulations, weakened enforcement, and increased risks for investors and financial markets.
SEC v. Jarkesy case forces the SEC to take accused fraudsters to federal court rather than in-house proceedings, making the process more complex and costly.
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision reduces agencies' power under the Chevron rule, shifting regulatory control to more elaborate and expensive trial procedures.
Investors may face additional risks due to legal challenges to SEC protections, possibly leading to more questionable accounting practices and reduced market stability.
Read at Fast Company
[
|
]