Economic choice in election is stark, bigger opportunity or a bigger state
Briefly

Kamala Harris asserts that the November election presents a choice between moving 'forwards' or 'backwards' in America's economic future, emphasizing distinct ideological differences.
She critiques right-wing economics as harmful, arguing that the election is about choosing between growing the economy and expanding government, thereby highlighting the clear contrast in policy.
Harris urges voters to consider the tangible track records of candidates rather than empty promises, suggesting that this election season uniquely allows for a judgment based on deeds.
While attempting to flesh out her economic plans aimed at affordability and supporting small businesses, her proposals are framed as lacking substance and veering into typical partisan rhetoric.
Read at New York Post
[
|
]