Boston City Hall was designated a historical landmark on January 25, highlighting its architectural and cultural importance. Despite this recognition, public opinion is divided; a survey revealed that 75% of readers feel the building does not deserve this status. While some praise its Brutalist design as unique and compelling, others express strong disapproval. Comments from readers illustrate the emotional response to the building, emphasizing its role in architectural discourse and art. Notably completed in 1968, it stands where the vibrant Scollay Square once thrived, adding to its historical significance.
"Regardless of whether or not you enjoy the architecture of City Hall, you have to admit that it does elicit a visceral response from just about everybody... This, I believe, is a hallmark of both good art and iconic architecture."
"It is a unique and compelling design. I have always loved it in spite of the criticism it received," reader S.D. from the South End said.
"My beautiful, Brutal, non-elegant City Hall!" reader Gregory L. from Holliston echoed the sentiments of many supporters.
"City Hall doesn't deserve landmark status, while just under a quarter said it definitely qualifies," highlighting the polarized views.
Collection
[
|
...
]