A claim of vicarious copyright infringement was dismissed on the grounds that the authors had not shown that there was substantial similarity between their books and ChatGPT's output.
The authors' claim that all ChatGPT outputs are infringing derivative work is insufficient, she added. Other claims that were dismissed included allegations of negligence, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]