Daniel Fryer, an assistant professor of law and philosophy at the University of Michigan, praised the Evanston example for targeting a specific injustice. He emphasized the necessity of understanding what is broken to effectively pursue reparations, stating, "An essential question is, what are we trying to repair? In order to repair something, we need to know what's broken, and it also helps to know why it's broken." This highlights the importance of clarity in the reparations discourse.
Christopher Lewis, an assistant professor at Harvard Law School, called for a deeper understanding of the various forms of reparations, advocating for a distinction between compensatory justice and utilitarian justice. He stressed that utilitarian justice embodies a moral principle aimed at achieving the greatest good for the largest number, framing the reparations conversation within a broader context of ethical considerations and societal benefits.
Collection
[
|
...
]