Gary Marcus argues that LLMs operate fundamentally on pattern recognition rather than true reasoning. Unlike human cognition, which combines experience with logical inference, LLMs rely on recognizing patterns in vast data corpora.
Marcus points to classic 'river crossing' puzzles; these problems have numerous variations in datasets, but any small change in the setup often results in nonsensical answers from an LLM.
He emphasizes how LLMs, while effective in generating text, often falter with tasks requiring genuine logical reasoning, showcasing the critical need for hybrid AI approaches.
Marcus highlights the societal implications of using LLMs without true reasoning capabilities, suggesting a potential risk in relying too much on this technology for complex decision-making.
Collection
[
|
...
]