Large language models (LLMs) maneuver proficiently through familiar language but encounter difficulties with paradox, ambiguity, and depth. This article suggests that human intelligence resembles a textured landscape rather than a mere collection of facts; humans navigate this terrain with instincts and emotional depth. While LLMs are adept at generating fluent language in less complex areas, they fall short in richly nuanced and abstract domains, reflecting limitations in their cognitive navigation compared to humans, whose ability to process uncertainty is a remarkable strength.
Humans don't simply store knowledge-we navigate it. And we do so with instincts, emotions, and deep memory. But what happens when we ask machines to walk that same terrain?
In the age of large language models (LLMs), we're discovering that the shape of cognition matters-and that not every traveler is equally prepared.
In this landscape, intelligence is less about how much you know and more about how well you move-your ability to recognize hazards, bridge gaps, and climb toward insight.
LLMs are surface-bound, struggling to climb the peaks of complexity where ambiguity and depth flourish, illustrating limitations in navigating more intricate aspects of thought.
Collection
[
|
...
]