The article critiques the current state of the discourse surrounding AI within the design community, highlighting a trend where discussions have devolved into divisive rhetoric rather than meaningful engagement. The author suggests that designers are losing sight of their creative judgment by overly relying on AI tools. It calls for a healthier dialogue that fosters clarity, creativity, and community, rather than engaging in competitive 'hot takes'. The piece reflects on how similar periods in the past were navigated with a more collaborative spirit, suggesting a need for change in today's conversation.
We’ve turned the discourse into a pissing contest. Who can get the most engagement? Who can rattle the most nerves? This approach alienates our design community.
We're losing ourselves to our worst instincts. This moment offers an opportunity for a smarter, more generous conversation about AI in design, rather than a game of hot takes.
Collection
[
|
...
]