The paper titled "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI" indicates that 40% of U.S. adults have used generative AI, suggesting a faster adoption than early PC usage.
Arvind Narayanan criticized the report, calling the 40% figure a 'hype case study,' noting that only a small percentage of work hours involve true generative AI assistance.
Narayanan emphasized that the actual figures show a slow adoption pace compared to early predictions and PC adoption, with only a fraction of workers using generative AI consistently.
The research found that just 0.5%-3.5% of work hours were aided by generative AI, with only 24% of workers using it in the previous week.
Collection
[
|
...
]