The incident of AI art winning a competition ignited a significant debate on copyright laws, questioning whether AI-generated works can truly be copyrighted.
The Copyright Office ultimately ruled that Jason Allen's piece lacked the necessary human authorship, limiting his ability to claim full copyright.
Despite claiming to spend over 110 hours on the piece, Allen's assertion raises broader concerns about the originality and ownership in AI art.
Allen's appeal highlights the contentious issue of unauthorized use of AI-generated art, paralleling lawsuits from artists against AI training data utilization.
Collection
[
|
...
]