The parents argue the school can't set rules on AI usage as no state guidance exists, claiming their son was graded unfairly due to a lack of explicit prohibitions.
The lawsuit describes the school's disciplinary actions against the student as a 'pervasive, destructive and merciless path of threats, intimidation and coercion' that jeopardizes his future.
Despite the defense that AI was only used for research, the school’s handbook cites forbidding 'unauthorized technology' and 'unauthorized use' of another's work as grounds for discipline.
The underlying issue in the lawsuit reflects longstanding tensions between overprotective parents and educational institutions, especially amid intense competition for college admissions.
Collection
[
|
...
]