When people get help from CriticGPT to review ChatGPT code they outperform those without help 60% of the time, preferred critiques from a team of human-plus-CriticGPT over a human without the AI tool.
Pairing a human with CriticGPT benefits in providing more comprehensive critiques than a human alone, addressing hallucinated errors, and filtering out unhelpful 'nitpicks.'
CriticGPT training involved inserting errors into ChatGPT code, comparing the model's critiques for error identification accuracy, expecting further development for handling complex outputs.
Collection
[
|
...
]