I built a Chrome extension using AI to simplify my product testing process.
Briefly

The article chronicles a developer's journey of utilizing various AI tools for creating a Chrome extension. Starting with GPT4o, they faced challenges such as manual loading and slow progress, prompting a transition to Replit. While Replit offered improvements, it was also overwhelming and costly, leading the developer to reconsider their approach. Through exploration, they recognized the distinction between AI agents and assistants and expressed a desire for a more straightforward solution, ultimately gravitating towards Claude for efficient code generation without complexity.
I realized that AI agents and assistants were two different controls. And I wasted my AI agent on bug fixes.
I started with GPT4o, where I dumped all my requirements in one shot but faced slow progress, leading me to switch tools.
Replit was an improvement over GPT4o, but I found it overwhelming and expensive, prompting me to consider alternatives for easier development.
Ultimately, I sought a more user-friendly solution for code generation, exploring Claude, which was suggested as the best for such tasks.
Read at Medium
[
|
]