A federal judge has ruled that OpenAI must preserve logs and data that it intended to delete, following lawsuits from media outlets including the New York Daily News. The ruling rejects OpenAI's claim of protecting user privacy as a distraction, affirming that the plaintiffs only seek anonymous data. They argue that OpenAI used copyrighted materials in training its AI without consent. The case highlights tensions in copyright law and the ethics of AI development, as the plaintiffs seek justice for massive copyright infringement claims against OpenAI's ChatGPT.
The judge has made clear and plaintiffs have made clear that they don't want to receive information that personally identifies the users of these conversations. If data is turned over, it will only be turned over anonymously. And OpenAI knows that.
This is like a magician trying to misdirect the public's attention... That is absolutely false. The privacy argument is nothing more than a distraction.
Collection
[
|
...
]