"It uses AI to generate code based on the user's desired application as opposed to manual coding. Essentially, tell AI what you want the app to do and voila, it's ready in seconds. In some ways, it's like conversational coding or having a coding concierge that attends to an individual's needs. You can imagine the benefits of allowing business users to whip up forms or a quick app without having to go through IT."
"It is natural to assume that with vibe coding, the code would be reviewed to avoid any mistakes or unleash potential issues. True vibe coders argue that rigorous review goes against the idea of using AI to generate code. This explains why so many have already relegated vibe coding to low-risk projects. There is a need for traditional AI-assisted coding and an emerging opportunity for vibe coding to coexist."
"When AI is infused into coding, there are always risks of quality and reliability. True vibe coders that come across bugs in the code say you can just keep telling AI to fix it until it's right. This is risky, especially when a business user is doing the vibe coding to build a quick fix app that has the potential to touch critical systems."
Vibe coding uses AI to generate applications from user descriptions, enabling rapid prototyping and empowering non-developers to create forms or quick apps. The approach resembles conversational coding or a coding concierge and benefits business users and developers for low-risk tasks. Some practitioners resist rigorous code review because it conflicts with the instant nature of vibe coding, leading many organizations to confine it to low-risk projects. Significant risks include code quality, reliability, and security exposure when business users lack development expertise. An AI tool might recommend a deceptively legitimate but harmful third-party dependency, increasing enterprise vulnerabilities.
Read at DevOps.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]