Just think: Machines would potentially standardize prose in a contemporary fiction landscape that already tends to value minimalist writing, and the ease with which robots might reproduce simple sentences and formulaic plots would mean that the stylists, the eccentrics, the strangely passionate human authors would finally stand out.
This optimism was quickly defeated by the realization that one of my day jobs, as a ghostwriter, would almost certainly become automated. ... rather than investing that money and time into, say, solutions to mass incarceration and climate change.
But machines will always need people to control them. The job will shift a little to be more like editing and supervising machines. Maybe 60% of people will go into those jobs instead. Why couldn't you be one of those people?
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]