The US Copyright Office's report clarifies that while artists can secure copyright for works created with AI tools, purely AI-generated content remains unprotected. Following extensive public comments, the report delineates that human involvement is crucial in determining copyright eligibility. It cites earlier rulings that removed copyright from entirely AI-generated materials and exemplified a case where a comic book received protection thanks to human contribution. The nuances suggest a low threshold for copyright, emphasizing individual analysis for each work.
Artists can copyright works created with AI tools, but purely AI-generated material is not eligible for copyright protection, clarifying the legal landscape for creatives.
The Copyright Office's new report indicates that while pure AI creations lack copyright, works with human input can receive it, indicating a nuanced approach.
The report, based on over 10,000 comments, provides clarity on copyright and AI, stating that human involvement determines the copyrightability of AI outputs.
The Copyright Office emphasizes that while AI can assist in creative processes, the output's copyrightability often hinges on the level of human contribution.
Collection
[
|
...
]