The article discusses how artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming capable of generating content rapidly but still lacks key characteristics that define human writing. It highlights that AI lacks lived experiences, which affects how it portrays nuances in emotions. Additionally, AI writing often overuses clichés, is prone to repetitive phrasing, and tends to adopt a monotone style, lacking the complexity found in human writing. The piece concludes with the suggestion that while AI can be an effective tool, it should not replace the unique qualities offered by human writers.
Because AI lacks lived experience, it can only pull from its database what certain emotions might feel, but can't describe them with nuance like a human can.
AI tends to throw in clichés. That's not to say human writers don't do the same, but whereas we can make conscious decisions, AI just pumps out words based on prompts.
If you scan through blocks of content punched out by AI, it isn't hard to pick out places where it echoes points already mentioned.
AI-generated content often defaults to a tone that lacks complexity, failing to capture subtle shifts and emotional layers involved in writing.
Collection
[
|
...
]