The court concluded that the fluoridation of water at 0.7 mg/L poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children, warranting regulatory action from the EPA.
Judge Chen emphasized that while there is no conclusive evidence of fluoridated water being injurious to public health, the risk is significant enough to demand attention.
The Fluoride Action Network argues that delaying or appealing this ruling could harm many children who lack access to water filtration alternatives.
The EPA now has the responsibility to create regulations to mitigate the risks associated with water fluoridation, although they may appeal the ruling.
Collection
[
|
...
]