Software development
fromInfoQ
1 day agoDynamic Languages Faster and Cheaper in 13-Language Claude Code Benchmark
Dynamic languages like Ruby, Python, and JavaScript are faster and cheaper for AI coding tasks compared to statically typed languages.
Rising RAM prices have made upgrading your PC more expensive. Virtual RAM is a less expensive way of boosting an older computer's performance, but it has limited use cases because it can't match the speed of physical RAM.
While the codebase is fresh and grows fast under the umbrella of the local environment, we tend to rely on debugging tools, which were created specifically for that purpose. The app is half-baked, and the code is split open. We observe it through the lens of our IDE and with the speed of our brain. Everything is possible; we may pause execution for minutes, and the whole system is a white box - an open book for us.
Both work with Linux's existing swapping mechanism. Swapping (called paging in Windows) is a way for the kernel to handle running low on available RAM. It chooses pages of memory that aren't in use right now and copies them to disk, then those blocks can be marked as free and reused for something else.
If you're trying to make sure your software is fast, or at least doesn't get slower, automated tests for performance would also be useful. But where should you start? My suggestion: start by testing big-O scaling. It's a critical aspect of your software's speed, and it doesn't require a complex benchmarking setup. In this article I'll cover: A reminder of what big-O scaling means for algorithms. Why this is such a critical performance property.
Kacper Borucki blogged about parameterizing exception testing, and linked to pytest docs and a StackOverflow answer with similar approaches. The common way to test exceptions is to use pytest.raises as a context manager, and have separate tests for the cases that succeed and those that fail. Instead, this approach lets you unify them. I tweaked it to this, which I think reads nicely: One parameterized test that covers both good and bad outcomes. Nice.