The election campaign could be marked by disinformation and cyberattacks to sow division, influence the public debate or to target candidates, parties or specific political programmes. The threat of interference targeting Denmark comes mainly from Russia but could also emanate from other state actors.
In August 2018, I laid out six specific false claims made in the dossier that would have led Democrats or the FBI to take action counter to their own interests: Russians hadn't had success hacking targets like Hillary Russians were planning to leak dated FSB intercepts rather than recent stolen emails Misattribution of both what the social media campaign included and who did it, blaming Webzilla rather than Internet Research Agency
John Ratcliffe's appearance on propaganda channels raises concerns about his alignment with Russian narratives, suggesting a dependency on a disinformation package crafted for the purpose of misleading audiences.
Durham was enthusiastic about the term 'put more oil into the fire', believing it confirmed his conspiracy theory that Hillary framed Trump with Russian disinformation.
Davis claims "everyone on earth knows" that the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia, which is described as beyond insane and sociopathic.
