Common advice like limiting individual youth access to screens, or asking parents to keep tabs on their children's every digital movement is not only impossible, but for adolescents in particular, potentially invasive, Schleider said. Instead, the AAP is putting more emphasis on the structural responsibility of companies and society, Schleider said. Their statement recommends regulations that limit overt, sexualized, commercialised, or harmful content to youth, including algorithms that send teens and children down rabbit holes with damaging themes.
This court finds, however, that the Act as drafted fails to pass constitutional muster and is constitutionally infirm, even if the government's most noble entreaties to protect its citizenry must abide by the U.S. Constitution.
