#gross-misconduct

#gross-misconduct

In considering harm, while there was no psychological harm to Inspector Thompson, the consequences on his career could have been significant if the officer's false allegations had been found proven. The panel were informed that since these allegations, Insp Thompson was put on restrictive duties and concluded this was actual harm. The panel also considered this is a type of reputational harm, both to Insp Thompson and to the Met.

The disciplinary panel ultimately found the officers had acted properly. Mr Tekeste had concealed his actions and the officers' risk assessment and level of observation were appropriate based on the information they had.