Instead, you have compelled me to testify, fully aware that I have no knowledge that would assist your investigation, in order to distract attention from President Trump's actions and to cover them up despite legitimate calls for answers. This institutional failure is designed to protect one political party and one public official, rather than to seek truth and justice for the victims and survivors, as well as the public who also want to get to the bottom of this matter.
The law required a wide release of millions of documents, photos, videos, and other files, with redactions limited to victims' names and other identifying information. The DOJ missed that deadline, and since then, there have been additional releases of files that have revealed additional powerful people who were in communication with Epstein, thousands of mentions of Trump, and controversial failures to redact victims' names.
"When this comedian I was not very familiar with made those horrific comments about punching trans individuals, I obviously am deeply offended by that, just as I've been offended when someone makes comments about hating Indian Americans or telling Indian people to go back to India," he said.
One fascinating name here is Alberto Gonzalez and Robert Mueller. He was the director of the FBI, and Alberto Gonzalez was the head of the DOJ when Epstein got his true get-out-of-jail-free card.
The Court cannot rule on the motion without additional submissions, requiring specific factors such as the identity of the party seeking disclosure and whether the defendant opposes it.
I've long been of the view that politically sensitive investigations like this should not reside within the Justice Department and FBI. I don't trust either agency institutionally.
