PHILLIP: But, Scott, I mean, wasn't the argument about that case, that civil case that she brought, that there were no victims to the alleged wrongdoing? Wasn't that the argument? So, then wouldn't if you were to apply that to this situation, how do you justify then charging her over $18,000, which allegedly which, by the way, again, like those are allegations. We don't know if there were communications between her and the mortgage company about a change of status for the property or anything like that. We don't know about that. But do you think that this is more of a victim a crime with a victim than the one against Trump?