The Court of Appeal ruled that building owners and developers are prohibited from recouping costs for fire safety remediation work from leaseholders, particularly for defects identified pre-2022. This decision follows the Grenfell Tower tragedy, where discoveries of safety issues have impacted older buildings. The ruling applies retrospectively to the Building Safety Act 2022. Angela Rayner emphasized the importance of the retrospective approach for addressing historical building safety defects. Legal disputes relevant to this ruling involved properties in Abbey Wood and the East Village Estate, concerning responsibilities for related costs.
The Court of Appeal ruling states that building owners and developers cannot recoup costs from leaseholders for fire safety remediation work. This significant decision has ramifications for who bears the financial burden of building safety-related costs moving forward. In light of the Grenfell Tower tragedy, safety issues were identified in older buildings. The ruling specifies that building owners cannot charge leaseholders for fire safety defects discovered prior to 2022, with the retrospective application of the Building Safety Act 2022 favoring leaseholders and residents.
Angela Rayner articulated that 'A retrospective approach provides for effective routes to redress against those responsible for historical building safety defects that have only recently come to light, whatever level of the supply chain they operated at.' Her statement emphasizes the importance of holding responsible parties accountable for past safety failures.
The court ruled on disputes involving Hippersley Point in Abbey Wood and five residential blocks in East Village Estate, influencing the financial responsibilities of building owners. In Hippersley, the owner's attempt to pass on costs to leaseholders during a tribunal was challenged, while in the East Village, a similar dispute arose involving a social housing provider.
The retrospective nature of the Building Safety Act 2022 was a critical element of its establishment, responding directly to issues raised after the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017. This legal framework seeks to alleviate the financial impact on residents who were unaware of the risks associated with their buildings until recent revelations.
Collection
[
|
...
]