President Trump's recent memorandum, aiming to promote classical architectural styles in federal buildings, reignites the long-standing debate over Brutalism, a polarizing design trend from the mid-20th century. While some appreciate its modernity and unique use of materials like concrete, others sharply critique its austere appearance. The memo highlights previous criticism of federal buildings designed in this style, suggesting a governmental preference for classical forms over contemporary Brutalist architecture. This discourse reflects deeper tensions within American architectural identity and cultural values.
Brutalism is polarizing; some see it as monumental while others view it as an eyesore, showcasing the architectural divide in American culture.
Trump's memorandum revives a conversation about federal buildings, calling for a return to classical architecture over the contentious aesthetic of Brutalism.
Collection
[
|
...
]