The article delves into the ethics surrounding opposition research, particularly focusing on the content that is acceptable to research and utilize against political rivals. It posits that the negative nature of the information does not inherently render the research unethical, drawing parallels to journalistic practices. The article emphasizes that the truth of the claims is paramount, asserting that researchers must ensure that any claim is more likely true than false and be mindful of the proportionality of evidence in relation to the potential harm of the claims.
The pursuit of negative information in opposition research is not inherently unethical, as long as the content is true and supported by proportional evidence.
Ethics demands that researchers consider the harm caused by claims, requiring stronger evidence for more damaging claims against political opponents.
#opposition-research #political-ethics #truth-in-politics #negative-information #evidence-and-credibility
Collection
[
|
...
]