"In some ways, there is no better place for philosophy than in a home. Homes are often where we can be with family or find solitude and in these and many other ways get some space and time to be ourselves and to think, perhaps to grow. If they are not stressed by conflict or marred by trauma, homes are places to reflect and to wonder. What better setting for philosophy, provided that the home is peaceful and secure enough, free enough, to admit of some small experiments in living?"
"But homes are also places that might seem antithetical to philosophy, and not just if they tragically happen to be formed around strife, stifling judgment, or the deterioration of communication. Even healthy homes may seem to be in tension with philosophy. Suppose that homes are places where you can relax and be yourself. But isn't philosophy a tradition that wants you to become something idealized and not yourself? Or suppose that homes are supposed to be down to earth and places where people can just talk about the everyday things of life. But isn't philosophy an academic practice that employs abstruse language and concepts far from the ordinary ways in which people speak? Or suppose that home is a place for emotions, but isn't philosophy abstract and overly intellectualized, a tradition pulling away from heartfelt and sincere feelings?"
Homes often provide safe, intimate spaces where people can be with family or find solitude, enabling reflection, wonder, and small experiments in living. When homes are peaceful and not marked by conflict or trauma, they offer time and freedom to be oneself and to think, perhaps to grow. However, homes can seem at odds with philosophy: they emphasize being oneself, everyday conversation, and emotional life, while philosophy can push toward becoming an idealized self, using abstruse academic language, and privileging abstract reasoning over heartfelt, sincere feelings.
Read at Apaonline
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]