In this essay, the author explores Kant's philosophical views on the moral status of animals, positioning them as means rather than ends due to their lack of rationality. He highlights Kant's indirect duties toward animals, stemming from our obligations to humans. Through analogy, Kant indicates that inhumane treatment of animals reflects on our moral character, suggesting that while animals don't possess rights as rational beings, our treatment of them holds profound implications for human ethics. This raises intriguing questions about the moral status of virtual persons and the ethics of re-animating deceased individuals, particularly celebrities.
Kant argues that while animals are means and not ends, indirect duties to them arise from obligations to humans, emphasizing a uniquely moral relationship.
Although Kant insists we have no direct duties to animals, he cleverly constructs indirect obligations, highlighting the potential moral repercussions on humanity.
Collection
[
|
...
]