Harvard expands its definition of antisemitism - when does criticism of Israel cross a line?

Harvard University has decided to adopt the IHRA working definition of antisemitism following lawsuits from Jewish students claiming discrimination. While this definition is supported by many Jewish leaders for its broad applicability, some scholars advocate alternative definitions, such as the Jerusalem Declaration. The debate underscores the ambiguity surrounding antisemitism and anti-Israel rhetoric, especially in light of recent global rises in antisemitism following tensions between Israel and Hamas. A deeper understanding of antisemitism's historical roots is crucial.

The controversy surrounding the adoption of the IHRA working definition highlights the ongoing struggle to discern the fine line between antisemitism and legitimate criticism of Israel.

The sharp rise in antisemitism globally since the outbreak of conflict showcases how historical animosities towards Jews continue to resonate in contemporary society.

Read at The Conversation