In oral examinations, the effectiveness of questioning plays a vital role in assessing a student's knowledge. Excessively long-winded questions with multiple components can confuse and impede the assessment process. For instance, starting with a lengthy preamble that includes references to philosophers and their views, as demonstrated with W. T. Stace, detracts from the core inquiry. Instead, a straightforward question like "What do you consider the best arguments against your position?" allows for a clearer evaluation of the student's understanding and critical thinking skills. Concise and focused inquiries encourage more precise and insightful exchanges between students and examiners.
It's crucial for faculty members to ask questions in a precise manner, avoiding long preambles that dilute the inquiries and confuse the student.
A concise question focuses on the core issue, allowing for a clear assessment of the student's understanding of complex philosophical arguments.
To evaluate a student's knowledge effectively, open-ended yet specific questions should be used, such as asking for the strongest opposing arguments to their stance.
Philosophical inquiries should challenge students to think critically and articulate their arguments succinctly, which is best achieved through well-crafted, focused questions.
Collection
[
|
...
]