Are observers fundamental to physics, or simply byproducts of it? | Aeon Videos

"Are observers central to physics, or are they more accurately framed as bystanders to and byproducts of phenomena that exist independently of consciousness? In this interview from the long-running series Closer to Truth, Bernard Carr, an emeritus professor of mathematics and astronomy at Queen Mary University of London, traverses the double-slit experiment, the fine-tuning argument and more to explore what significance, if any, first-person observation holds in the realm of fundamental physics."

"Bernard Carr, an emeritus professor of mathematics and astronomy at Queen Mary University of London, traverses the double-slit experiment, the fine-tuning argument and more to explore what significance, if any, first-person observation holds in the realm of fundamental physics. In his conversation with the US presenter Robert Lawrence Kuhn, he doesn't adopt a personal stance. Instead, he considers these persistent questions through a contemporary frame, assessing how discussions around them have evolved and where they stand among physicists today."

Observers could be central to physical theory or might be bystanders and emergent byproducts of phenomena that exist independently of consciousness. Quantum phenomena such as the double-slit experiment and cosmological considerations like the fine-tuning problem foreground questions about whether first-person observation has ontological or explanatory significance. Contemporary framings investigate how observer-dependent effects integrate with objective descriptions and whether any observational role requires revising fundamental physical principles. No consensus emerges; positions range from treating observers as causally and conceptually central to viewing them as derivative, and physicists continue to debate and refine arguments without a decisive resolution.

Read at Aeon