Appeal to Tradition 2: The Test of Time & The Origin Problem
Briefly

This essay critiques the fallacy of appealing to tradition, particularly focusing on the concept of the 'test of time'. While longstanding beliefs may seem valid, mere longevity does not guarantee correctness or goodness. The essay differentiates between traditions upheld without scrutiny and those subjected to rigorous testing over time. Beliefs that have been proven through consistent assessment warrant acceptance based on evidence, not tradition. The core argument emphasizes that even beliefs passing rigorous testing should not be labeled true simply due to their historical context.
The test of time can be defined in terms of actual testing. If a belief has passed rigorous assessments over time, it still should not be accepted solely based on tradition.
Historical longevity does not suffice as evidence of truth or goodness, and beliefs can persist long after being disproven, showcasing the fallacious nature of the appeal to tradition.
Read at A Philosopher's Blog
[
|
]