Why A.I. Isn't Going to Make Art
Briefly

Art requires making numerous choices, especially in writing fiction where a ten-thousand-word narrative comprises about ten thousand individual decisions, reflecting the artist's unique vision.
While current large language models produce subpar fiction, one can envision future advancements where A.I. stories could potentially rival human creations in complexity and creativity.
The narrative machine in Dahl's 'The Great Automatic Grammatizator' prompts contemplation about whether art can truly emerge from mere algorithmic processes, reflecting our intrinsic beliefs about creativity.
Defining good versus bad art remains complex, yet the essence of art lies in the decision-making process artists engage in, which machine-generated works may lack.
Read at The New Yorker
[
]
[
|
]