Should the bottom line be up front? Only with context, Bryan Garner says
Briefly

Should the bottom line be up front? Only with context, Bryan Garner says
"Many lawyers have eagerly adopted the buzzword "BLUF"-bottom line up front-as if invoking the acronym were synonymous with careful thinking. The catch is that almost no one stops to ask the important question: What exactly is meant by "bottom line"? The answer isn't obvious, and it shifts with context. In military writing, the "bottom line" is a concrete decision or action a commander must take-stated at the very start because the commander already knows the mission, the terrain and the stakes."
"BLUF began life as a U.S. military convention in the late 20th century, when leaders wanted written communications that busy commanders could understand in a single rapid reading. Manuals on "effective writing for Army leaders" and "writing in the Army style" hammer the point: State your purpose and main recommendation-your bottom line-immediately, then supply background and justification. The doctrine isn't subtle."
Many lawyers have adopted BLUF—bottom line up front—as a buzzword without defining what 'bottom line' means. The meaning varies by context: military writing uses it to state a concrete decision or action for commanders who already understand mission, terrain and stakes. In legal practice, the bottom line should answer a legal and factual problem; without a clearly framed problem, a purported bottom line becomes a slogan. Abstract formulations like 'We're entitled to summary judgment' or 'There are no genuine issues of material fact' are unhelpful. BLUF originated as a military convention aimed at delivering rapid, precise recommendations, and it assumes a knowledgeable, decision-ready reader.
Read at ABA Journal
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]