The article critiques a trend where authors, particularly those labeled as 'pale, stale, and male', claim to be silenced by the publishing industry. An Australian author recently lamented low male representation in the Booker prize shortlists but failed to provide sufficient statistical evidence. The author argues that instead of seeking validation through complaints, writers should adopt practical strategies for success, such as changing their names to counter gender biases and actively participating in fostering cultural excellence in literature. The overall message encourages authors to pursue meaningful activism instead of perpetuating a narrative of victimization.
If you really want to make a name for yourself, publish comment insisting you've been silenced. It happened again last week in a nationwide publication.
Statistics around gender representation in publishing offer authors pale, male, stale, or indifferent channels for meaningful activism beyond seeking validation from notoriously fickle newspaper-readers.
I'm committed to building a culture of excellence that looks like Australia. I can only presume that's the shared goal?
If you're concerned your work is pre-invalidated by a gender prejudice, I personally recommend neutralising your name ahead of any literary submission.
Collection
[
|
...
]