The article reflects on the challenges of academic writing, particularly the misconception that scholarly articles must be dense and complex. An invitation to publish leads to questions about writing style, revealing a common struggle among graduate students and faculty regarding what makes effective writing in academia. The author highlights the importance of clarity and presents five fundamental principles that can enhance writing skills, which stem from research in cognitive neuroscience. The piece emphasizes that effective revision and feedback are crucial for developing strong writing, countering the subjective nature of assessment in educational settings.
Active voice makes sentences clearer, engaging, and easier for readers to follow, fostering better comprehension of complex ideas.
Despite the common perception that writing in academia requires dense prose, clarity should take precedence to ensure research is accessible.
Cognitive neuroscience provides insights into how writing is perceived, enabling educators to teach effective writing strategies based on science rather than artistic intuition.
Many students don't revise their writing significantly post-feedback due to the belief that grades reflect personal instructor preferences rather than universal writing standards.
Collection
[
|
...
]