The article discusses the evolution of early written languages from pictographs, highlighting their advantages over more modern alphabetic systems. Ancient writing forms, such as cuneiform and hieroglyphs, were more intuitive since they directly represented objects and concepts. Unlike alphabetic systems that correspond to sounds, pictographs required no learning, facilitating immediate understanding. The text suggests that prehistoric art may have scaffolded early language, as depictions resonated with natural cycles known to humans long before formal writing. Finally, while pictographic communication is effective, it is also time-consuming to create, a factor that has evolved with the rise of the internet.
The earliest written languages derived from pictures, known as pictographs, evolved over time as symbols became more abstract, ultimately leading to modern writing systems.
Unlike alphabetic systems that represent sounds, pictographs offer advantages as they represent the world directly and do not require learning or translation.
Paleolithic pictures predating writing systems suggest they may have served as scaffolding for spoken language, closely attuned to the details of the natural world.
Creating intricate pictures demands time and skill, indicating that instantaneous recognition via pictographs has been crucial in aiding communication throughout history.
Collection
[
|
...
]