What We Lose When Question Period Becomes Performance Art | The Walrus

"I spent nine years on the "wrong" side after being elected in 1984 alongside only thirty-nine other Liberals. I wanted desperately to be in government, but I found my time across the aisle very formative. I participated fully in the parliamentary experience. I was made a critic, served on committees, asked questions, took part in debates, and addressed audiences at functions across the country."

"In his book Something Within Me, he describes his time in opposition as anything but wasted. "It resembled in many ways an apprenticeship; a period to absorb knowledge and hone skills. When we won power, I was prepared to deal with challenges in a far more capable manner than I would have had I still been a rookie to Parliament.""

Opposition work should prepare a government-in-waiting rather than serve only to wound the government. Serving in opposition can act as an apprenticeship that sharpens speaking skills, refines political instincts, and teaches members to accomplish tasks with limited support. Active participation as critics, committee members, questioners, debaters, and public speakers builds experience and visibility. Practical experience without extensive ministerial staff fosters independence and capability. A contrasting approach treats opposition as a content factory focused on clips, clicks, and confrontation driven by news cycles that prize conflict. Preparing to govern requires steady, substantive work rather than constant escalation.

Read at The Walrus