Can Iran's asymmetric warfare hold US-Israeli military power at bay?

"When the balance of capabilities is unequal in a conflict as it is in relation to weapons in this one the weaker party can turn to unconventional methods of warfare. This is known as asymmetric warfare. This can include the use of guerrilla tactics, terrorism, cyberattacks, use of proxies and other indirect tools, in order to offset conventional inferiority, avoid the enemy's strengths, and exploit vulnerabilities in political will, logistics, and legal or ethical constraints."

"What makes Iran distinctive is not that it uses these methods at all, but that they sit at the centre of its grand strategy rather than at its margins."

Iran has continued retaliatory strikes against the US and Israel despite Trump's declarations of victory, disrupting global financial and energy markets. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi stated that bombings in Tehran do not impact Iran's war capabilities, citing two decades of studying US military defeats in the region. Analysts identify Iran's strategy as asymmetric warfare, where the weaker party employs unconventional methods including guerrilla tactics, terrorism, cyberattacks, and proxy forces to exploit vulnerabilities in the stronger opponent's political will, logistics, and constraints. Iran's distinctive approach integrates these asymmetric methods into its core grand strategy rather than treating them as peripheral tactics. This contrasts with the US and Israel's reliance on expensive missiles and drones for conventional military operations.

Read at www.aljazeera.com