"You gotta say the deal sounds very much like surrender on our part, which I'm in favor of. I mean, great. This needed to end, ugly or any other way."
"The Iranians proved to be tough MF'ers, and they realized that they had something far more powerful than a nuclear bomb – they had control over the Strait of Hormuz."
"It was folly to begin with, it was folly throughout, it remains folly. The U.S. military would be able to pummel Iran, but previous American wars in the Middle East proved it would not be worth it."
"Mark Levin wanted it, along with Ben Shapiro, Sen. Lindsey Graham, and Miriam Adelson. Levin was practically in tears after the deal because we didn't see it through."
Megyn Kelly expressed her opinion on President Trump's two-week ceasefire deal with Iran, describing it as a form of surrender that she supports. She emphasized the need to end the conflict, which she deemed folly from the start. Kelly criticized the ongoing war, stating that the U.S. military could defeat Iran but previous conflicts showed it would not be worthwhile. She highlighted the resilience of Iran's regime and its strategic control over the Strait of Hormuz, countering claims of successful regime change in Iran.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]