"Regarding genetics in general, some believe that, from a security standpoint, it's even more serious than the invention of the atomic bomb. It could have colossal consequences for humanity. Of course, we must not only not fall behind here. We must be ahead."
"If energy, food and migration are weapons, then science becomes a weapon too."
Genetics is described as potentially more serious than the invention of the atomic bomb and capable of causing colossal consequences for humanity. The argument emphasizes the need to avoid falling behind technologically and to maintain superiority in genetics. Advancements in artificial intelligence and biotechnology are linked to the same strategic calculus and are portrayed as additional domains that could overtake nuclear weapons in threat magnitude. The rhetoric frames scientific progress as a form of strategic power. Observers warn that if energy, food and migration can be used as weapons, scientific fields can similarly become weapons, amplifying global security risks.
Read at London Business News | Londonlovesbusiness.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]