Middle East in flames': what the papers say about the war on Iran

"The New York Times editorial board published an opinion piece headlined Trump's attack on Iran is reckless. While noting that nobody should mourn the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the paper goes on to say that the presidents's goals are ill-defined, he has failed to line up international and domestic support and he has disregarded both domestic and international law for warfare."

"The Murdoch-owned New York Post has an editorial headlined Trump's bold move to rid the world of Iran's evil regime once and for all. However this plays out, it's easily the most significant single action in the Middle East in decades, perhaps centuries, the paper's editorial reads."

"From Ankara to Zurich, the US president's extraordinary daytime attack on Iran was reported with a mixture of fear, anger and elation, with the questions of what comes next a recurring theme across the global media."

Following US and Israeli military attacks on Iran and the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, international media outlets provided varied coverage reflecting geopolitical divisions. The New York Times criticized the operation as reckless, citing ill-defined goals and disregard for international law. Iranian-American perspectives warned of grim prospects for Iranian freedom. British outlets presented mixed analyses, with some supporting Trump's actions while others expressed concern. Conservative media outlets praised the operation as significant and necessary action against Iran's regime. The coverage highlighted global uncertainty about regional consequences and the operation's long-term implications for Middle Eastern stability and international relations.

Read at www.theguardian.com