Can courts make fossil fuel companies pay for climate change? These cases are trying
Briefly

In a landmark ruling, a German court rejected a Peruvian farmer's claim that RWE's historical greenhouse gas emissions contributed to increased flooding risks in his hometown of Huaraz. Farmer Sául Luciano Lliuya highlighted the melting glaciers above his home as evidence of climate change threats. RWE, not operating in Peru, denied any legal responsibility, citing the global nature of climate contributions. This ruling could set a significant legal precedent, as experts acknowledge the growing movement towards holding major polluters accountable for climate impacts, evidenced by several ongoing cases in other jurisdictions.
A German court ruled against Peruvian farmer Sául Luciano Lliuya, alleging climate change impacts due to RWE's historical emissions threat, marking a notable decision in climate accountability.
RWE denied liability, claiming climate change results from numerous factors globally, indicating the challenges ahead in attributing responsibility for climate impacts to single entities.
Legal experts suggest the ruling could set a crucial precedent for accountability in climate law, as it addresses the responsibility of corporations for their historical emissions.
This case comes amid a broader trend, where climate litigation is gaining traction worldwide, with significant legal battles aimed at improving accountability of major industrial polluters.
Read at Fast Company
[
|
]