USA Fencing defends decision to be inclusive of trans players
Briefly

In a recent fencing match at the University of Maryland, Stephanie Turner was disqualified after she refused to compete against her transgender opponent, capturing significant attention on social media. USA Fencing defended the decision, stating that rules prohibit refusing to fight a properly entered fencer. Turner views the incident as a civil rights violation and opposes the organization's policies regarding transgender athletes, seeking a reconsideration of the guidelines which require testosterone suppression before competing in women's events. The situation spotlights the intersection of sports, gender identity, and integrity.
A fencer is not permitted to refuse to fence another properly entered fencer for any reason; such a refusal results in disqualification and sanctions.
The incident was described by Turner as serious, emphasizing that it transcends sports and touches upon broader civil rights issues.
Turner disagreed with USA Fencing's policies, stating that they are unfair to cisgender athletes and advocate for a reevaluation of such regulations.
USA Fencing defends its policies, asserting they maintain fair competition standards and protect the integrity of the sport amid discussions on transgender inclusion.
Read at Advocate.com
[
|
]