Security and Architecture: To Betray One Is To Destroy Both
Briefly

Security and Architecture: To Betray One Is To Destroy Both
"In the early days of computing, architecture and security barely acknowledged each other. Architecture was more rigid, monolithic in her thinking, obsessed with making things work."
"Suddenly there was threats everywhere. Threats were sliding into architectures, DBs. Suddenly there was more catfishing. More threats were emerging in the solutions for architecture."
"Today, there is a commitment, a public commitment. They're deeply connected. They have built a zero trust household, have embedded DevSecOps into their model."
"Threat actors have become more sophisticated, but they're threat modeling. They're helping to fortify their assets against the outside threats."
In the early computing days, architecture and security operated independently, with architecture focused on functionality and security on compliance. The internet boom introduced numerous threats, prompting architecture to adopt agile, microservice-driven practices. Security evolved to become proactive, integrating into architectural frameworks. Today, architecture and security are committed partners, implementing zero trust and DevSecOps models. This collaboration enhances scalability and resilience while protecting against sophisticated threats. Despite this progress, challenges and betrayals still exist within their relationship.
Read at InfoQ
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]