The pursuit of understanding human happiness presents unique challenges for researchers due to its subjective and ambiguous nature. Despite nearly a century of study, there has been no consensus on how to effectively define or measure happiness. Alejandro Cencerrado of the Happiness Research Institute suggests the most straightforward approach is to directly ask individuals about their feelings, acknowledging the limitations of this method while emphasizing its usefulness.Many institutes have found that people perceive happiness in a multidimensional way, echoing philosophical discussions of happiness dating back to Aristotle's concept of eudaimonia, or the good life.
"Researchers who dare to explore these muddy fields must grapple with the subjective, ambiguous, and even ethically sensitive aspects of their objects of study."
"There are no 100% reliable methods for measuring happiness... It's subjective, and it always will be, he adds."
"If I ask you how happy you are today on a scale of nought to 10, you can give me a pretty good idea."
"Applying this method, various institutes around the world have reached a similar conclusion: that the vast majority of people understand happiness in a multidimensional way."
Collection
[
|
...
]